Peter Pays Paul

The “bailout” or “rescue” is the hot topic on most lips these days. In fact it is hard to escape on any of the media outlets.

Below are a few articles for you to ponder on this issue.

Is Purchasing $700 billion of Toxic Assets the Best Way to Recapitalize the Financial System?

Nouriel Roubini argues against the proposed plan. He summarizes, “Thus, the Treasury plan is a disgrace: a bailout of reckless bankers, lenders and investors that provides little direct debt relief to borrowers and financially stressed households and that will come at a very high cost to the US taxpayer.”

You Can’t Rescue the Financial System If You Can’t Read a Balance Sheet

John Hussman details the reasons that the current plan only provides a benefit if the Treasury pays above market value for the value of the securities, a very reassuring thought (sic). (HT:Naked Capitalism)

Bankruptcy, not bailout, is the right answer

Jeffrey Miron from Harvard argues that the government should do nothing and let the companies that invested in the bad investments go bankrupt. He states, “Bankruptcy punishes those who took excessive risks while preserving those aspects of a businesses that remain profitable.” He argues that bad government policy should not be fixed with more government. He also reasons that credit markets are frozen is likely caused by the current owners of bad securities being unwilling to sell them at the offered price, because they are waiting for Uncle Sam to come in and pay a higher price.

Real estate investors that are seeking to grow their invested capital commonly use 1031 Tax-Deferred Exchanges.

These exchanges allow the borrower to apply more of the proceeds from the sale of an existing investment property to the purchase of a new investment property.

1031 Exchanges Defined

This is an explanation of an 1031 exchange according to the IRS website:

Generally, if you exchange business or investment property solely for business or investment property of a like-kind, no gain or loss is recognized under Internal Revenue Code Section 1031.

My explanation in a nutshell: a real estate investor can sell a piece of investment property, defer the capital gains tax until a later date, and roll the entire gain into the purchase of a new piece of investment real estate. The taxes are deferred (postponed) until the investment property is sold the final time.

Benefits of 1031 Exchanges

Deferring the taxes due on capital gains (appreciation) can reap huge rewards over time. Deferring payment of capital gain tax allows the savvy investor to apply more capital towards the purchase.

Leverage should allow the investor to generate a higher return through appreciation and/or cash flow.

1031 Exchange Hurdles

Now of course the government doesn’t make it an easy process and sets limits and restrictions on how a 1031 Exchange must be executed.

One of the main restrictions is the timing on completion of a 1031 Exchange. The exchange must be completed within 180 days of the transfer of the exchanged property. This deadline can put pressure on all involved to complete the deal within the 180 day period.

The costs of missing this deadline can be large. The borrower will be forced to pay capital gains tax on any gain as well as any penalties that might be incurred if the contract date is not met.

Most exchangers will typically qualify for standard financing. However, on occasion an institutional lender will be unable to provide financing within the mandated 180 days.

Using a Hard Money Loan to Execute a 1031 Exchange

If the primary lender is unable to close on time, what is the investor to do?

One of the benefits of using hard money is the speed that hard money lenders provide. A hard money lender that lends their own funds and is well operated can provide commercial financing within 14 days of receiving a complete package.

Another benefit is that most lenders offer loans on a short term basis. The hard money loan can help an investor close the transaction while a more permanent loan is arranged.

While the fees associated with hard money may be higher than a traditional source, the benefits of completing the transaction within the mandated time may outweigh the costs.

1031 Example

The following example should help demonstrate my point. Below are the assumptions we will use for our example.

Below are the costs that would be associated with a failure to execute the contract on time. I have only included what I would cite as the most basic and immediate costs. (There would be the potential loss of future returns as a result of cash flow and/or appreciation.)

The current capital gains rate is 15% but is set to increase in 2010. By including the deposit I am assuming that the deposit became non-refundable at some point.

Below I have computed the after tax costs of a hard money loan. The pricing below is on the high side for a short-term, conservative LTV loan.

Conclusion

As you can see from the example the after-tax cost of hard money may be less than the cost of not executing the 1031 exchange on time.

Hard money is not the best option for all scenarios. When a deal is on the line and speed is needed, hard money is a good alternative to institutional financing.

For more information head on over to Jeff Brown’s blog to find out more about 1031 exchanges and when to execute them.