Peter Pays Paul

The “bailout” or “rescue” is the hot topic on most lips these days. In fact it is hard to escape on any of the media outlets.

Below are a few articles for you to ponder on this issue.

Is Purchasing $700 billion of Toxic Assets the Best Way to Recapitalize the Financial System?

Nouriel Roubini argues against the proposed plan. He summarizes, “Thus, the Treasury plan is a disgrace: a bailout of reckless bankers, lenders and investors that provides little direct debt relief to borrowers and financially stressed households and that will come at a very high cost to the US taxpayer.”

You Can’t Rescue the Financial System If You Can’t Read a Balance Sheet

John Hussman details the reasons that the current plan only provides a benefit if the Treasury pays above market value for the value of the securities, a very reassuring thought (sic). (HT:Naked Capitalism)

Bankruptcy, not bailout, is the right answer

Jeffrey Miron from Harvard argues that the government should do nothing and let the companies that invested in the bad investments go bankrupt. He states, “Bankruptcy punishes those who took excessive risks while preserving those aspects of a businesses that remain profitable.” He argues that bad government policy should not be fixed with more government. He also reasons that credit markets are frozen is likely caused by the current owners of bad securities being unwilling to sell them at the offered price, because they are waiting for Uncle Sam to come in and pay a higher price.

Related Posts

• Tax Relief for 20,000 Contra Costa County Homeowners
• You Might Want To Think About Stopping Your Mortgage Payments and Reducing Your Income
• FDIC Plan Tests Limits of Leniency - WSJ.com
• Bankrupting the Middle East?
• Wishing on the Retirement Star